On March 15, 2022, President Biden signed an omnibus spending bill into law, which, in part, requires companies to report cyber incidents and ransom payments. The relevant portions of the law, titled the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act
Data breach
Who gets to decide to pay the ransom in a ransomware attack?
The onslaught of ransomware attacks since the pandemic began has not slowed. Organizations have been faced with the task of continuously reviewing their cybersecurity programs to ensure they are following best practices to protect against ransomware groups. But organizations also…
US banking regulators promulgate a final rule for 36-hour notice of breach



On November 18, 2021, the US federal banking regulators Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve Board and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation jointly announced a final rule that will require banking organizations (which includes the U.S. operations of foreign banking organizations) to notify their regulators as soon as possible but no later than 36 hours of identifying a significant “computer-security incident” that results in “actual harm” and rises to the level of a “notification incident” as defined in the final rule. The proposed rule would also impose a separate notification requirement on companies (such as data processing companies) that provide certain services to those banks. Those service providers would be required to notify “each affected banking organization customer as soon as possible when the bank service provider determines that it has experienced a computer-security incident that has caused, or is reasonably likely to cause, a material service disruption or degradation for four or more hours.” The final rule reflects several significant changes to the proposal that had been issued for comment in January 2021, including a narrowing of the definition of “computer security incident” from merely “significant” incidents and a notification window of 36 hours instead of “immediate[].”
The final regulations go into effect on April 1, 2022, with a compliance date of May 1, 2022.
Customers Can Pursue Negligence Claims Directly Against Vendor


On October 19, 2021, a federal trial court in South Carolina ruled that a group of consumers could proceed with common law negligence and gross negligence claims directly against their organizations’ vendor that had been the victim of a security breach—instead of suing the organizations of which they were customers. In re Blackbaud, Inc. Customer Data Breach Litigation, Case No.: 3:20-mn-02972-JMC, MDL No. 2972 (D.S.C. Oct. 19, 2021). The court therefore denied the vendor’s motion to dismiss these counts in the plaintiff’s complaint, although it did grant the motion to dismiss for the plaintiff’s negligence per se and unjust enrichment claims.
Connecticut tightens its data breach notification laws

Effective October 1, 2021, an amendment[1] to the Connecticut General Statute concerning data privacy breaches, Section 36a-701b, will impact notification obligations in several significant ways. The amendment:
- Expands the definition of “personal information”;
- Shortens the notification deadline after discovery
…
Another One Bites the Dust: Court once again finds data breach forensic report isn’t protected by privilege
On July 22, 2021, a federal court in Pennsylvania held that an investigative report created by Kroll (the “Kroll Report”), the defendant’s third party cybersecurity consultant, and related communications were not protected by privilege. The court found that the Kroll…
Connecticut enacts cybersecurity breach safe harbor


On July 6, 2021, Connecticut enacted a new law (Public Act 21-119) that creates a safe harbor for companies that followed certain cybersecurity protocols in the event there’s a security breach.
NYDFS settles cybersecurity regulation matter for $3 million


On April 14, 2021, the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) announced a $3 million settlement with insurance company National Securities Corp. (NSC), relating to violations of three different requirements of the NYDFS cybersecurity regulation during the period 2018 to 2020.
Privacy commissioners take position on using facial recognition technology




Investigative findings
In a joint investigation report, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, together with the commissioners of BC, Alberta, and Quebec concluded that Clearview AI violated Canadians’ privacy rights under federal and provincial privacy laws by scraping billons of images…
Deutsche Wohnen fine now declared invalid by a German court
There has been a big bang in the data protection world in Berlin as the first and most spectacular GDPR fine in Germany has just been declared invalid.
The Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection for Freedom of Information (Berliner…