Even when stringent protective orders are in place, clients are often concerned that the sensitive information they are required to produce in litigation will end up being disclosed or used for improper purposes. Clients often ask whether the protective order
February 2026
Celebrating Global Information Governance Day: Why information governance matters more than ever
Happy Global Information Governance Day!! Today we celebrate information governance and raise awareness of how to manage data, balance risks and build a culture focused on good data hygiene.
Working with large and small companies around the world, we have…
Partial compliance is noncompliance: Lessons from California’s $2.75 million settlement with Disney
On February 11, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a $2.75 million settlement with The Walt Disney Company (“Disney”), the largest civil penalty to date under the California Consumer Privacy Act as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act…
The DOJ’s civil cyber-fraud initiative lives on: Insights from cybersecurity enforcement through the False Claims Act
The False Claims Act (“FCA”), the U.S. federal government’s principal civil anti-fraud statute, imposes liability on entities that knowingly submit, or cause the submission of, false or misleading claims for payment to the United States. The FCA has long served…
Tax authorities’ access to individuals’ banking data: the European Court of Human Rights sets privacy limits in the case of Ferrieri and Bonassisa v. Italy
The 2026 opened with a notable decision by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case of Ferrieri and Bonassisa v. Italy.
The ECtHR found the violation of Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection…