Tag archives: Binding Corporate Rules

Hamburg DPA leader: Model Clauses, BCRs and EU-US Privacy Shield are probably insufficient

Data Protection Report - Norton Rose FulbrightOn February 26, 2016,  Article 29 Working Party member and head of the Hamburg Data Protection Authority, Prof. Dr. Johannes Caspar, again spoke at an event about the consequences of the invalidation of the Safe Harbor, emphasizing his position on the transfer of personal data from the EU to the US.… Continue reading

EU-US Privacy Shield scrutinized in Article 29 Working Party initial response

Data Protection Report - Norton Rose FulbrightOn February 3, 2016, the Article 29 Working Party (WP29) released a statement on the consequences of the Schrems judgment, following an assessment of the legal framework and the practices of US intelligence services. The WP29 expressed continuing concerns about the US framework for processing personal data for intelligence purposes, in spite of recent reforms.… Continue reading

German Data Protection Authorities Suspend BCR approvals, question Model Clause transfers

Data Protection Report - Norton Rose FulbrightFollowing on from the EU Article 29 Working Party Statement of 16 October 2015, the Conference of the German Data Protection Authorities – (“DPAs”) has today issued guidance (referred to as a Position Paper) on the consequences of the CJEU decision in the Schrems case (Case C-362/14).… Continue reading

CJEU decision in Schrems: what businesses should do next

Data Protection Report - Norton Rose FulbrightThis week, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled that the EU-US Safe Harbor Decision is invalid in Case C-362/14 (the “Schrems” case).  This followed a similar opinion from its Advocate General, which also sets out the facts of the case. The decision will impact businesses that rely on the EU-US Safe Harbor … Continue reading

Schrems: Commission holds press conference on ECJ ruling invalidating the Commission’s Safe Harbor Decision

Data Protection Report - Norton Rose FulbrightAs discussed in our post earlier, in today’s ruling on Case C-362/14 (the so-called “Schrems” case), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) invalidated the EU Commission’s “US Safe Harbor” decision with immediate effect. In the meantime, the EU Commission held a press conference discussing the impact of the judgement.… Continue reading

Day-after-Safe Harbor action plan: anticipating ECJ Schrems decision

Data Protection Report - Norton Rose FulbrightAs we have written extensively, the European Court of Justice’s (ECJ’s) ruling in the Schrems case on October 6, 2015 may effectively invalidate the US-EU Safe Harbor framework. While we believe that the Advocate General’s rationale for the proposal is weak, organizations that rely on the Safe Harbor are anxious about the consequences such a … Continue reading

Europe and US slated to agree on revised US-EU/US-Swiss Safe Harbor framework

Data Protection Report - Norton Rose FulbrightIt is being reported that the European Union and the United States are nearing an agreement on the revised US-EU/US-Swiss Safe Harbor framework. Thousands of US companies that have certified compliance with the Safe Harbor should be encouraged that the framework – which has been the subject of sustained criticism by European data protection regulators … Continue reading
LexBlog